Working in Glass Houses
Transparencies about salaries and job satisfaction? Sounds like a communist plot brewing.
Only a few days old on the Web, Glassdoor is already blanketed in buzz. The site allows working Joes and Janes to dish on their corporate life, from salary to CEO (dis)satisfaction.
While built on the same free concept as travel site TripAdvisor or real estate tell-all Zillow (whose CEO happens to be a Glassdoor founder), the rating system does require participation to see all company reviews.
The most practical appeal may lie in the naked dollar. Despite—or perhaps because of—a rabidly capitalistic bent, Americans are loath to reveal their compensation... except through the magic of anonymity and aggregation. While the San Francisco Chronicle summed up the possible legal brouhahas in revealing the information, Salon already charted a software engineer salary graph—even though Glassdoor boasts only 3,300 reviews at launch.
Middle management and HR hair-pulling aside, will Glassdoor work? Its launch this week already pushed the term into the top 40,000 searches. The initial Silicon Valley bias naturally has brought in online onlookers from the San Francisco-Bay Area and Sacramento, but interest also hails from Chicago, New York, Houston, Philadelphia, and Dallas-Fort Worth. Despite the heavy tech emphasis, women make up 40% of queries.
To compare: Zillow's 2006 launch attracted six times more buzz, and now ranks in the top 1,000 searches this past week. Arguably, there may be more homeowners curious about their assets (and their neighbors') then people comparing their corporate lot.
Then again, Glassdoor's timing during the highest unemployment jump in years may not necessarily be bad: People who feel stuck may find the site a good place to vent, brag or whistleblow. If this were around when Scott McClellan was in the White House...
Filed under: Employment, Jobs, Careers, Internet, Web 2.0, Salaries
A Cover Letter Like No Other
Dear Hiring Manager,
We were thrilled to read about your internship opening. We believe our experience in the field of "search term interpretation," as well as our talent for living frugally, makes us ideal candidates for this unpaid position.
To show just how qualified we are, we took the liberty of examining several recent queries as chronicled by Yahoo!'s Buzz Log. Searches on "administrative professionals day" and "secretaries day" both posted triple-digit gains, proving them to be motivated self-starters. Ecards, the cheap manager's gift of choice, also showcased their customer fixation, up 23% for the holiday.
As always, resumes are doing well in Search. Like us, they thrive in fast-paced, high-energy environments. They're currently in high demand among the Buzz's top 350 searches, and related terms like "resume samples," "resume help," and "cover letter examples" have leveraged their core values, whatever that means.
We hope you've found this cover letter an indication of our sheer determination and desperation. We look forward to meeting with you at your earliest convenience.
Sincerely,
The Buzz Team
top movers
| Rank | Subject | 1-Day Move |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Worst Airports For Delays 2009 | Breakout! |
| 2 | How To Survive A Recession | Breakout! |
| 3 | Ice Cream Calorie Counter | Breakout! |
| 4 | Jayson Williams | Breakout! |
| 5 | Alexandra Kerry | Breakout! |
| 6 | Chaz Bono | 10707% |
| 7 | Kelly Osbourne | 3298% |
| 8 | Jennifer Hudson | 3218% |
| 9 | Nicole Richie | 2075% |
| 10 | Thierry Henry | 1125% |

top leaders
| Rank | Subject | Move | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Black Friday | +413 | 1016 |
| 2 | Elizabeth Lambert | -677 | 263 |
| 3 | NFL | +66 | 235 |
| 4 | New Moon | +74 | 213 |
| 5 | Bing | +83 | 209 |
| 6 | Kelly Osbourne | +193 | 199 |
| 7 | Hulu | +7 | 139 |
| 8 | Nicole Richie | +124 | 130 |
what's the buzz?
A subject's buzz score is the percentage of Yahoo! users searching for that subject on a given day, multiplied by a constant to make the number easier to read. Weekly leaders are the subjects with the greatest average buzz score for a given week.
For more detailed information, visit our FAQ.